There is a distortion running through our culture like an invisible program. It works subtly and quietly, yet it destroys relationships from the inside out. This distortion can be summed up in one sentence: emotional competence is labeled as instability. Structure is celebrated as strength, even when it is, in truth, simply a form of escape. The effect is fatal. Those who can feel, name what is real, and lead from within are pathologized. And those who withdraw from the emotional space remain untouched and in the right.

When I speak of masculine and feminine, I do not mean social roles. I mean fundamental forces of life. Energetic qualities that exist in every human being, regardless of gender. The masculine field is holding, protection, boundaries, direction, responsibility, and the ability to hold space. Masculinity is not harshness. Masculinity is the ability to create stability, not through control, but through inner steadiness. The feminine field is receiving, feeling, resonance, intuition, connection, and truth through the body. Femininity is not neediness. Femininity is the ability to feel life, embody truth, and nourish relationship.

A mature human being lives both forces. The masculine within me ensures that I lead myself: I hold boundaries, I decide, I protect my space, I stabilize myself from within. The feminine within me ensures that I am alive: I feel, I receive, I am connected, I allow myself to be touched. When both forces are in balance, something rare emerges: inner sovereignty. Freedom.

Why do many women find inner work easier? Not because women are better human beings, more capable, smarter, or more evolved. It is the result of social conditioning. In a patriarchally coded culture, it is often, unconsciously, true that women lose connection if they do not adapt. Many women therefore learn early to self reflect, to regulate, to mediate, to understand what is happening in the other person, and to hold the relationship. Not because they are inherently superior, but because their safety has depended on it. Men, on the other hand, have been able in many systems to function for a long time without ever learning an emotional language, and they have not been sanctioned for it. This imbalance is not nature. It is culture.

Many relationships today do not fail because of a lack of love. They fail because two people meet and one or both are caught in a distortion: emotionality is seen as weakness, and structure is seen as strength. Then something typical happens: one person feels and names what is real, the other feels overwhelmed, and instead of taking responsibility, the entire emotional level is devalued. Emotions then become “drama,” “instability,” “too much.” This is convenient, because it allows the one who lacks emotional competence to remain superior. Yet the truth is this: the ability to lead emotions is strength.

Here lies the core of the distortion: I cannot do it, therefore you are wrong. A person cannot stand within themselves, take a position, hold emotions, or speak about inner states. And instead of recognizing this inability, learning, and growing, something else happens: it gets projected onto the other. The message becomes: you are unstable. You are complicated. You do not have your life under control. This is not communication. It is humiliation. Because it shifts the problem. No longer is the lack of emotional competence the topic. Instead, the person who possesses it becomes the problem. This is how the old system remains stable. It protects itself through distortion.

We are at a turning point. More and more people sense that a relationship without emotional presence is not a relationship. A partnership is not a comfort model, and it is not a structural safety zone. Love is presence, communication, responsibility, truth, and dignity in contact. The new era begins where we turn the field back the right way: emotional competence is stability. Clear boundaries are love. Truth is intimacy.

​

​